{"id":22263,"date":"2026-09-15T14:33:54","date_gmt":"2026-09-15T18:33:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/"},"modified":"2026-09-16T15:00:23","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T19:00:23","slug":"federal-assessment-pipeline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"22263\" class=\"elementor elementor-22263 elementor-22216\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b27c3b1 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"b27c3b1\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-f1c6464 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"f1c6464\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><b>Montr\u00e9al, September 11, 2026 <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8211;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> he Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE), Nature Qu\u00e9bec, SNAP Qu\u00e9bec, the David Suzuki Foundation, the Regroupement national des conseils r\u00e9gionaux de l\u2019environnement du Qu\u00e9bec, Greenpeace Canada, Fondation Rivi\u00e8res, Eau Secours, and \u00c9quiterre strongly condemn the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Regulations Amending the Physical Activities Regulations<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> ( specifically \u201cProject List\u201d) published last Thursday, which allow a range of projects posing high social, environmental, and economic risks (interprovincial pipelines, oil and gas facilities in national parks or protected areas, etc.) to no longer be subject to the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Impact Assessment Act (IAA)<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Only the Canadian Energy Regulator (CER) is now responsible for assessing these projects. <\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The removal of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) eliminates the external perspective of an organization that, unlike the CER, does not maintain an ongoing relationship with project proponents and the energy sector. The signatories condemn this decision, which significantly weakens the federal impact assessment process and carries significant risks of underestimating the environmental, social, and economic impacts of these projects. <\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cLet\u2019s be clear: this is not about eliminating duplication. What is being removed today is not administrative redundancy, it is the safeguards we have collectively put in place to make informed and enlightened choices and ensure the protection of the public,\u201d state the signatory organizations.<\/span><\/p><h3><b>What the Regulations Change<\/b><\/h3><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The amendments remove several categories of activities from the Project List that were previously subject to the IAA, including<\/span><\/p><ul><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">international and interprovincial pipelines<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">international and interprovincial power transmission lines<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">certain offshore renewable energy projects regulated by the CER<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">oil and gas facilities located in national parks or protected areas and regulated by the CER<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">in-situ oil sands extraction facilities<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">fossil fuel-fired power plants<\/span><\/li><\/ul><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In practice, energy projects falling under the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Canadian Energy Regulator Act, <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> such as pipelines, power transmission lines, and certain offshore projects, are now assessed solely by the CER, acting on its own. The integrated review panel, which until now had included both the IAACand the CER, has been eliminated for these projects. <\/span><\/p><h3><b>A Limited Assessment<\/b><\/h3><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By removing the IAACfrom the process and entrusting the review of energy projects to a single sector-specific regulatory body, the very nature of the process risks changing from an integrated assessment that examines a project\u2019s overall relevance to the public interest to a review focused more on technical regulatory issues such as route selection, technology, and operating parameters. Broader questions about the very relevance of certain projects and their cumulative impacts on affected communities risk being pushed to the sidelines. <\/span><\/p><h3><b>Weakened Public and Indigenous Participation<\/b><\/h3><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the CER provides for its own hearing and consultation mechanisms, meaningful public participation, respect for the rights of Indigenous peoples, and environmental protection lie at the very heart of the mandate and expertise of the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. By removing the Agency from the equation, there is a serious risk that the process will become less accessible to the public and to Indigenous peoples potentially affected by these projects.  <\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cIt was precisely to ensure greater distance from the fossil fuel industry and to address serious obstacles, particularly to public participation, that the process was overhauled a few years ago,\u201d the signatory organizations emphasize. <\/span><\/p><h3><b>An Unjustified and Unfounded Measure<\/b><\/h3><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These projects were already subject to a single integrated impact assessment, conducted by a joint review panel of the IAACand the CER. <\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The signatory organizations believe this decision is fully in line with a series of measures taken by the federal government over the past months, which weaken public protections and pave the way for new environmental, social, and economic fiasco. <\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-87ac20a e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"87ac20a\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-ece6ffd elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"ece6ffd\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>-30-<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-a53a286 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"a53a286\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-09260bf elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"09260bf\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><b>Signatory organizations:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE)<\/span><br\/>Eau Secours<br\/>\u00c9quiterre<br\/>David Suzuki Foundation<br\/>Fondation Rivi\u00e8res<br\/>Greenpeace Canada<br\/>Nature Qu\u00e9bec<br\/>Regroupement national des conseils r\u00e9gionaux de l\u2019environnement du Qu\u00e9bec<br\/>SNAP Qu\u00e9bec<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Montr\u00e9al, September 11, 2026 &#8211; he Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE), Nature Qu\u00e9bec, SNAP Qu\u00e9bec, the David Suzuki Foundation, the Regroupement national des conseils r\u00e9gionaux de l\u2019environnement du Qu\u00e9bec, Greenpeace Canada, Fondation Rivi\u00e8res, Eau Secours, and \u00c9quiterre strongly condemn the Regulations Amending the Physical Activities Regulations ( specifically \u201cProject List\u201d) published last Thursday, which allow [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":22287,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_theme","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[905,904,918],"tags":[],"ressource_annee":[952],"categorie_association":[938],"ressource_type":[],"class_list":["post-22263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy-and-natural-resources","category-public-participation","category-regulation-of-environmental-impacts","ressource_annee-952","categorie_association-nouvelles-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CQDE - Ensemble, pour un droit au service de l&#039;environnement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1575\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"695\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Eriffe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Eriffe\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Eriffe\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6f8f6f3d3449caf9f6f6be76324f3818\"},\"headline\":\"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":645,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Energy and natural resources\",\"Public participation\",\"Regulation of environmental impacts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/\",\"name\":\"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00\",\"description\":\"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png\",\"width\":1575,\"height\":695},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/news\\\/federal-assessment-pipeline\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"CQDE\",\"description\":\"Ensemble, pour un droit au service de l&#039;environnement\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Centre qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois du droit de l'environnement\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"CQDE\",\"alternateName\":\"Centre qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois du droit de l'environnement\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/02\\\/cqde-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/02\\\/cqde-logo.svg\",\"caption\":\"CQDE\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/6f8f6f3d3449caf9f6f6be76324f3818\",\"name\":\"Eriffe\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cqde.org\\\/en\\\/author\\\/eriffe\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE","description":"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE","og_description":"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.","og_url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/","og_site_name":"CQDE - Ensemble, pour un droit au service de l&#039;environnement","article_published_time":"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1575,"height":695,"url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Eriffe","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Eriffe","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/"},"author":{"name":"Eriffe","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6f8f6f3d3449caf9f6f6be76324f3818"},"headline":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight","datePublished":"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/"},"wordCount":645,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png","articleSection":["Energy and natural resources","Public participation","Regulation of environmental impacts"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/","name":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight | CQDE","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png","datePublished":"2026-09-15T18:33:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-16T19:00:23+00:00","description":"Restez inform\u00e9s avec nos derni\u00e8res nouvelles : \u00e9clairages juridiques sur les grands enjeux environnementaux, communiqu\u00e9s et actions de mobilisation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/cqde_pipelines_communique_annonce_federale-1-1.png","width":1575,"height":695},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/news\/federal-assessment-pipeline\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Federal Pipeline Assessment: Environmental Groups Decry the End of Independent External Oversight"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/","name":"CQDE","description":"Ensemble, pour un droit au service de l&#039;environnement","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Centre qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois du droit de l'environnement","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#organization","name":"CQDE","alternateName":"Centre qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois du droit de l'environnement","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/cqde-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/cqde-logo.svg","caption":"CQDE"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/6f8f6f3d3449caf9f6f6be76324f3818","name":"Eriffe","url":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/author\/eriffe\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22263"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22263\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22290,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22263\/revisions\/22290"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22263"},{"taxonomy":"ressource_annee","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ressource_annee?post=22263"},{"taxonomy":"categorie_association","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorie_association?post=22263"},{"taxonomy":"ressource_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cqde.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ressource_type?post=22263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}